Tuesday, June 29, 2021

Travel with Dante

 


Associating Dante Alighieri (1265-1321) with the theme of travel is almost obvious for several reasons; above all, his major work, the Divine Comedy , which narrates the path of the author in the afterlife, and his life as an exile, forced by political events to leave his native Florence and wander in various Italian courts. The title of the exhibition, however, also intends to suggest the possibility of an organized visit with routes, stops, places of departure and arrival that each visitor can build at will. For those who wish, there is certainly also a prepared path, indicated by the succession of exhibited pieces grouped according to themes, as if you were in the different rooms of an exhibition. It starts from Dante's life and continues with the chronology of his works , he arrives at his masterpiece, the Comedy , showing how over the centuries it has been “imagined” by illuminators, engravers, printers. A "room" of the exhibition is therefore dedicated to Giovanni Boccaccio, reader, and not only, of Dante. There are many other works, not only poetic, to which adequate space is dedicated, and which have contributed to transforming Dante into an icon not only as the "father of the Italian language" but also in a literal, portraiture sense, with his representations that appear in engravings, medals and coins.

Urb. Lat. 365, f. 46r, Inf. XVII-XVIII: Dante and Virgil are transported towards the eighth circle on the back of Geryon, half centaur half sea monster


Urb. Lat. 378, f. 31r, incipit of Purgatory: Dante and Virgil on the spacecraft of the genius

The whole exhibition Travel with Dante is now online: spotlight.vatlib.it/dante digi.vatlib.it/view/MSS_Vat.l, f. 1v spotlight.vatlib.it/dante/feature/

Sunday, June 27, 2021

Philip Guston, from Abstract painter to a artist whose powerful images still evoke controversy


June 27, 1913. Philip Guston (born Phillip Goldstein (June 27, 1913 - June 7, 1980), was a painter and printmaker in the New York School, an art movement that included many abstract expressionists like Jackson Pollock and Willem de Kooning. In this image: Philip Guston, "Untitled", (book, ball and shoe), 1971. Oil on paper, 50.2 x 70.5 cm., 19 3/4 x 27 3/4 inches. (T004167) ©The Estate of Philip Guston. Courtesy: Timothy Taylor Gallery, London.


He is best known for his incisive, cartoonish paintings and drawings ranging in subject matter from everyday scenes to narrative political satires, particularly those of Richard Nixon. Guston’s work received varying degrees of critical praise throughout his lifetime, shifting as he changed course.

Into the 1970s, Guston created a distinct visual vocabulary.
Cigarettes, shoes, enlarged eyeballs, limbs, and other less discernible forms make up Guston’s instantly recognizable later paintings, which have a predilection for shades of pink, red, and blue in their compositions. But those works too received little praise from critics when they were first exhibited at Marlborough Gallery in New York in 1970, and he left the U.S. for a sojourn at the American Academy in Rome, where he made a series of works focused on the Italian landscape. When he returned to Woodstock after eight months abroad, Guston got to work on his first series, completed in 1971, of satirical, cartoonish drawings of Richard Nixon.

Following the Watergate Scandal, the artist made additional drawings with the president as their subject, as well as the now iconic painting, San Clemente (1975), with its large, bandaged foot referring to the disgraced president’s bout with phlebitis. While those works were not publicly shown for decades, Guston did present a selection of his drawings from 1938 to 1972 at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in an exhibition curated by Henry Geldzahle





 

 Despite Guston’s perennial relevance and popularity, there isn’t a single, comprehensive volume that surveys his life and work. The closest book to fulfill that role, Robert Storr’s brief but excellent introduction, Guston (1986), is more than 30 years old. Philip Guston: A Life Spent Painting fills the gap admirably, with a clear, chronological text by Storr, a section of writings by the artist, and generous, plentiful reproductions that make it by far the most expansively illustrated tome on the market. The book also features a superb ‘Chronology’, tracing Guston’s milestones through personal letters and reviews, with photographs, invitations and other ephemera, assembled from the artist’s archive by editor Amanda Renshaw.


In a more personal final chapter, ‘Guston after Guston’, Storr reflects on Guston’s legacy and his own history and engagement with Guston’s work over almost 50 years. In one passage he addresses what he views as Ross Feld’s ill-considered dismissal of Guston’s abstract work (Feld, in his book, calls Guston a ‘shamming, less-than-committed abstractionist’). Storr has a point: one cannot simply put aside Guston’s abstract work because we now think of him as the artist who flamboyantly rejected the New York School. Guston always had a vivid and distinctive voice as a painter, whether in the chunky effulgence of Native’s Return (1957) or the clarity of the acrylic and ink works on paper he painted months before he died. Storr concedes that Guston’s ‘second act’ secured his place in art history, and he is understandably loath to underestimate Guston’s achievement as an abstract artist, or even disparage, as a painter of abstracts himself, the mode at all. But we cannot ignore how forcefully Guston expressed his frustrations about abstraction. ‘I can’t find any freedom in abstract art,’ he said, or, ‘every time I see an abstract painting now I smell mink coats.’ Abstraction reeked of death and decoration, of purity and absolutes.


From Wikipedia: In 1960, at the peak of his activity as an abstractionist, Guston said, "There is something ridiculous and miserly in the myth we inherit from abstract art. That painting is autonomous, pure and for itself, therefore we habitually analyze its ingredients and define its limits. But painting is 'impure'. It is the adjustment of 'impurities' which forces its continuity. We are image-makers and image-ridden." 

From 1968 onward, after moving away from abstraction, he created a lexicon of images such as Klansmen, light bulbs, shoes, cigarettes and clocks. In late 2009, the McKee gallery, Guston's long-time dealer, mounted a show revealing that lexicon in 49 small oil paintings on panel painted between 1969 and 1972 that had never been publicly displayed.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Guston

Friday, June 25, 2021

Sam Francis

 

Sam Francis was an American artist known for his exuberantly colorful, large-scale abstract paintings. His practice incorporated elements from Abstract Expressionism, Color Field painting, Impressionism, and Eastern philosophy to create a unique style of painterly abstraction. Influenced by Jackson Pollock and Clyfford Still, he is more closely associated to the work of Helen Frankenthaler, as he was more interested in the formal arrangement of the picture plane than the expressivity of the individual artist. “Painting is about the beauty of space and the power of containment,” he once reflected. Born on June 25, 1923 in San Mateo, CA, he briefly served in the US Air Force during World War II but was injured during a test flight. Returning to California, he received his BA and MA from UC Berkeley in botany and psychology before beginning to pursue a career in art. The artist traveled widely during his career, and he was closely aligned with the Art Informel movement while living abroad in Paris during the 1950s. Francis died on November 4, 1994 in Santa Monica, CA at the age of 71. He was a founding trustee of Los Angeles’s Museum of Contemporary Art, and his paintings can be found numerous museums. 




He began his artistic career  in a body cast at age 21, and died at 71 of cancer, working with the utmost difficulty—using only his left hand and strapped to a wheelchair. Yet of all the great American abstract impressionists, Sam Francis’ work is perhaps the most joyous.

“The personal lives of American painters are tragic…and inevitable. And do not explain the artist,” said Sam Francis, who was as articulate with words as he was with ink and paint. But often, the work itself does. Although he traveled the world with and for his art, for much of his life he based himself in Santa Monica. He loved the Southland’s light, “clear, bright, even through the haze.”

The Bay-Area borne Francis took to abstract impressionism as fast as he learned to paint in Paris after 1950 under the GI Bill. Within months, he was one of the best known—and best-accepted--of the wild new generation of American modern painters that included Jackson Pollock and Mark Rothko.  By the mid-`50s, Time magazine acclaimed him the most popular  US painter in Paris. He was doing murals for major New York banks. Yet, unlike some of his compeers, he was evolving constantly, finding new forms, new textures, even formulating new paints for his scalene bubbles of joy.

“You go as far as you can, as fast as you can,” he wrote. But he rarely interpreted his work: “Paintings are my thinking,” he said. “Not about anything.”  But the viewer may find his or her own feelings, memories, thoughts, hopes and fear drawn out by their surfaces with their shapes of what were sometimes called “insistent biomorphic forms,” bright, evocative colored areas that hit you like animated Rorschach blobs.  This isn’t the cooler, alienated work of the later East Coast expressionists. Francis’ pictures are brilliant, emotive, alive, engaging. He said, “They perform the unique mathematics of my imagination.”

Unlike his popular and widely distributed lithographs, which he cranked out with great rapidity in his Santa Monica Litho Shop, Inc.,  Francis took his time with his big paintings. Sometimes, however, they form a tight historical sequence—like the “Blue Ball” series of  50 years ago, imagined as he lay ill with severe kidney disease in a Swiss hospital. There,  round shapes hung before his vision, “A hell-like paradise of blue balls,” he later wrote. By the end of the paintings’ sequence, the “balls” begin to look like intricate extraterrestrial devices. Representational, perhaps, but of nothing on earth.

Then, as earlier and later, he tried to use his art to paint away his disease, his pain. Only in the very end, when he was crippled by advanced prostate cancer,  did it fail him. But the pictures he did in his last months, with their new submarine greens and early sunrise reds, exceed in their imagination anything he’d done before. 

Thursday, June 17, 2021

Escher. Born on June 17, 1898

 


Poster advertising the first major exhibition of Escher's work in Britain (Dulwich Picture Gallery, 14 October 2015 – 17 January 2016). The image, which shows Escher and his interest in geometric distortion and multiple levels of distance from reality is based on his Hand with Reflecting Sphere, 1935

The Dutch artist Maurits C. Escher (1898-1972) was a draftsman, book illustrator, tapestry designer, and muralist, but his primary work was as a printmaker. Born in Leeuwarden, Holland, the son of a civil engineer, Escher spent most of his childhood in Arnhem. Aspiring to be an architect, Escher enrolled in the School for Architecture and Decorative Arts in Haarlem. While studying there from 1919 to 1922, his emphasis shifted from architecture to drawing and printmaking upon the encouragement of his teacher Samuel Jessurun de Mesquita.

After 1935, his interest shifted from landscape to something he described as "mental imagery," often based on theoretical premises. This was prompted in part by a second visit in 1936 to the fourteenth-century palace of the Alhambra in Granada, Spain. The lavish tile work adorning the Moorish architecture suggested new directions in the use of color and the flattened patterning of interlocking forms. Replacing the abstract patterns of Moorish tiles with recognizable figures, in the late 1930s Escher developed "the regular division of the plane." The artist also used this concept in creating his Metamorphosis prints. Starting in the 1920s, the idea of "metamorphosis"—one shape or object turning into something completely different—became one of Escher's favorite themes. After 1935, Escher also increasingly explored complex architectural mazes involving perspectival games and the representation of impossible spaces.

“I fear that there is only one person in the world who could make a really good movie about my prints: myself,” Maurits Cornelis Escher wrote to an American collector in 1969. This quote, which appears at the beginning of Robin Lutz’s new documentary about the famed Dutch graphic artist, M.C. Escher: Journey to Infinity, is one of many statements Escher made during his life about how his visually hypnotic works might translate into moving imageshttps://www.artnews.com/art-news/reviews/mc-escher-documentary-review-1234582697/


Few 20th-century works are as omnipresent as, for instance, Ascending and Descending (1960), perhaps Escher’s signature image, in which dour, cowled figures trudge up and down the same, impossibly looped, staircase. But that very familiarity makes coming to it and trying to see something new strangely rewarding. Its contradiction rests on the dimensionally warped staircase (derived from the speculations of the mathematician Roger Penrose), but also in its uneasy tension between playful teasing of the eye and grim dystopia. Escher wrote cheerily of the resting figures he had dotted here and there, ‘no doubt sooner or later they will be brought to see the error of their non-conformity.’ Sooner or later – but it’s hard to imagine any of these scenes have a past or a future. They are curiously detached from time. (1960? That late?).  https://www.apollo-magazine.com/the-mysteries-of-m-c-escher-at-the-dulwich-picture-gallery/



Official website: 
https://mcescher.com/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M._C._Escher

The impossible world:  https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2015/jun/20/the-impossible-world-of-mc-escher

Monday, June 14, 2021

Happy Belated Birthday to Anne Frank

 

Happy Birthday to Anne Frank.


From Robert Reich:  Anne Frank would be 90 years old today. We owe her, and the millions more who perished, from infants to the elderly, to never forget their stories. We must teach future generations about the murderous horrors of the Holocaust and the danger of seeing fellow human beings as "others."

Friday, June 11, 2021

June - Strawberry Moon

 

BL Yates Thompson, MA 36. 1444-1450. Dante Alighieri, Divina commedia. Italy, f179r


JUNE – STRAWBERRY MOON

Used by the Algonquin, Ojibwe, Dakota, and Lakota peoples, among others, this name came about because ripe strawberries were ready to be gathered at this time. 

Similarly, Berries Ripen Moon is a Haida term. Blooming Moon (Anishinaabe) is indicative of the flowering season. The time for tending crops is indicated by Green Corn Moon (Cherokee) and Hoer Moon (Western Abenaki).

Eighteenth-century Captain Jonathan Carver wrote that Native Americans whom he had visited used the term Hot Moon.

The Tlingit used the term Birth Moon, referring to the time when certain animals are born in their region. Egg Laying Moon and Hatching Moon are Cree terms for this period.

Thursday, June 10, 2021

Courbet. 19th century French painter who still has the power to shock,


 With his revolutionary politics, egomania and insistence on crude realism, Gustave Courbet scandalized Parisian society and the art world, says Tom Lubbock


Gustave Courbet has been seen for most of the 20th century as the patriarch of the avant-garde ideal, a man both embodying his time and working in defiance of bourgeois taste: in short, a hero. He was born in 1819 the son of a farmer, lived as a socialist, and died in 1877 exiled in Switzerland, his paintings deemed unexhibitable in France on political grounds. In the end, Courbet was financially crushed by a judgment imposed on him by the French government of more than 300 million francs. (Portion of a review by Robert Hughes, the rest is behind a paywall)



Edgar Degas said that looking at Gustave Courbet’s paintings made him feel as if he were being nuzzled by the wet nose of a calf. That’s an apt analogy for a tremendous Courbet retrospective at the Metropolitan Museum with pungencies proper to barnyards, bedrooms, and buggy dells. Courbet is the most purely forceful—because he’s forcefully impure, spitting on purity—painter of all time. (Among the Old Masters, only Tintoretto comes close.) “Realism,” his byword, describes less his method—a talented mélange of cunning and not so cunning, brazen artifices—than effects that stupefy the mind as only reality, when it overloads the senses, can. (Peter Schjeldahl review of the 2008 Courbet retrospective)


Courbet's study may be the only painting in western art to show that women do possess something extraordinary. So why is it so seldom shown (in painting, that is). Contemporary porn is another matter as it seems to consist solely of close-ups of female genitalia.  Courbet's model has her legs spread, her shift pulled high enough to uncover her breasts and cover her face, and her cleft is open to our gaze. Still, it is what it is and not some other thing, as Bishop Butler said, and Courbet tacitly concedes that realism is not enough by giving the work the preposterously inflated tide The Origin of the World. (It is appropriate that this work comes from the private collection of Jacques Lacan.)


Courbet relished scandal as a shortcut to prominence at a time when, for artists, official honors and patronage were losing cachet to notoriety in the popular press and success in the commercial markets. His calculated affronts flaunted his impunity as a bona-fide hero of French culture.

In the autobiography, “The Most Arrogant Man in France: Gustave Courbet and the Nineteenth-Century Media Culture” (Princeton; $45), by Petra ten-Doesschate Chu, a Dutch-born American scholar of nineteenth-century European art, details the rise, the fall, and the tireless machinations of art’s first recognizably modern careerist. (The title is Courbet’s contented characterization of himself.)

But the autobiography gives short shrift to Courbet's talent as a painter.
 


 The fact that many of Courbet's works were made in a studio negates his often bombastic claims of realism. Some of his outdoor scenes are unconvincing and artificial. His light is often took black, the dreary dullness of a poorly lit indoor studio.

But there is nothing fake or artificial about his painting of trout, hooked and bleeding, done in 1873 when Courbet was crushed by the humiliation of imprisonment. His crime was to have written a letter to the Government of National Defense, proposing that the column in the Place Vendôme, erected by the Napoleon I to honour the victories of the French Army, be taken down.

On 16 May, just nine days before the fall of the Commune, in a large ceremony with military bands and photographers, the Vendome column was pulled down and broke into pieces.

"The Trout" is an allegory of Courbet himself, crushed by the cruel retaliation of the French government. They were going to make him pay for a life time of rebellion and in particular, for his part in the Paris Commune of 1870.  It is painted in an unflinching realist style. Signed on the lower left in red oil paint, it is also inscribed with the Latin phrase "vinculis faciebat: (made in bondage)"

On 4 May 1877, Courbet was told the estimated cost of reconstructing the Vendome Column; 323,091 francs and 68 centimes. He was given the option paying the fine in yearly installments of 10,000 francs for the next 33 years, until his 91st birthday. On 31 December 1877, a day before the first installment was due, Courbet died, aged 58, in La Tour-de-Peilz, Switzerland, of a liver disease aggravated by heavy drinking.

One may question aspects of his persona, much of which was necessary to get publicity in the competitive art world of the time. But it is relevant that this self-described socialist's career opened with the Revolution of 1848 and closed with the Paris Commune of 1871.

"[They] call me ‘the socialist painter.' I accept that title with pleasure. I am not only a socialist but a democrat and a Republican as well--in a word, a partisan of all the revolution and above all a Realist ... for ‘Realist' means a sincere lover of the honest truth." Gustave Courbet, Metropolitan Museum of Art exhibition catalogue (New York: Hatje Cantz, 2008) p. 19. (Quoted from Petra ten-Doesschate Chu, Correspondences de Courbet, 1996, p. 97.)



http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2007/07/30/070730crbo_books_schjeldahl

http://www.artnews.com/2008/02/01/the-mysterious-journey-of-an-erotic-masterpiece/

http://www.artnews.com/2007/11/01/top-ten-artnews-stories-exposing-the-hidden-he/

Biography: http://www.musee-orsay.fr/en/collections/courbet-dossier/biography.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustave_Courbet

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/features/why-gustave-courbet-still-has-power-shock-744386.html

Sunday, June 6, 2021

Women making art.


 Button designed by Sylvia Pankhurst for the UK suffragette campaign c. 1911. “We have to free half of the human race, the women, so that they can help to free the other half.” - Emmeline Pankhurst.


Ann Macbeth (1875 - 1948), embroiderer, designer, teacher and author, a member of the Glasgow School. She was a suffragette who engaged in militant action, was imprisoned and force-fed for which she sustained lasting injuries.


Embroidery by the first hunger striking suffragette, Scottish artist Marion Wallace Dunlop (1864-1942) #womensart


Edwardian embroidered Scottish Suffragette belt (c.1908-1909) in the colors green, white and violet- thought to be inspired by the first letters of the phrase ''Give Women the Vote

Embroidery by May Morris  (1862–1938), English artisan, embroidery designer, women's rights and suffrage supporter

Thursday, June 3, 2021

Raoul Dufy. Master of colorful, cheerful art.

 

Raoul Dufy. Master of colorful, cheerful art.


Raoul Dufy (French; 3 June 1877 – 23 March 1953) was a Fauvist painter, brother of Jean Dufy. He developed a colorful, decorative style that became fashionable for designs of ceramics and textiles, as well as decorative schemes for public buildings. He is noted for scenes of open-air social events. 
He was also a draftsmanprintmaker, book illustratorscenic designer, a designer of furniture, and a planner of public spaces.



In the early 1920s Dufy rededicated himself to painting and began to produce what are now his best-known works. His distinctive style is characterized by bright colors thinly spread over a white ground, with objects sketchily delineated by sensuously undulating lines. Dufy took as his subjects scenes of recreation and spectacle, including horse races, regattas, parades, and concerts. He spent much of his time on the French Riviera and produced series of paintings of Nice (1927), the Bois de Boulogne (1929), and Deauville (1930). He also worked as an illustrator and printmaker, creating whimsically drawn etchings and lithographs in the 1920s and ’30s. Though very popular, his lively, carefree, elegant paintings have been criticized as occasionally bordering on the superficial. Which is, of course, the last thing that an artist is allowed to do. 



It's been said that Dufy never painted a sad picture, for Dufy's particular brand of modernism was unhampered by doubt or strain. Rather, it expressed the most optimistic aspects of the 20th century with wit and style. Dufy's discovery of Fauvism in 1905 was a revelation, and helped him to free color and line from their mimetic functions; his subsequent encounter with Cubism would inform his dynamic Art Deco fabric designs, employed by such famous couturiers as Paul Poiret. By the 1920s, the artist had settled upon what would become his hallmark stenographic style, combining deft and spontaneous outlines with broad and boundless areas of vivid color. He would further adapt this style in several large-scale public works from the 1930s, as well as in a series of paintings devoted to famous classical musicians at the end of his career. Even the great modernist writer Gertrude Stein was lyrical about this quality of his art, saying succinctly: "One must meditate about pleasure. Raoul Dufy is pleasure."

In the late 1940s and early 1950s, Dufy exhibited at the annual Salon des Tuileries in Paris. By 1950, his hands were struck with rheumatoid arthritis and his ability to paint diminished, as he had to fasten the brush to his hand. In April he went to Boston to undergo an experimental treatment with cortisone and corticotropin, based on the work of Philip S. Hench. It proved successful, and some of his next works were dedicated to the doctors and researchers in the United States. In 1952 he received the grand prize for painting in the 26th Venice Biennale. Dufy died at Forcalquier, France, on 23 March 1953, of intestinal bleeding, which was a likely result of his continuous treatment. He was buried near Matisse in the Cimiez Monastery Cemetery in Cimiez, a suburb of the city of Nice.