Tuesday, January 31, 2023

Matisse.

 









 Far from taking too rosy and sentimental a view, most of the time, Most of us suffer from excessive gloom. We are only too aware of the problems and injustices of the world. Our problem is actually that we feel debilitatingly small and weak in the face of them. It’s because we feel overwhelmed and hopeless that we recoil into ourselves. 

Cheerfulness is an achievement and hope is something to celebrate. If optimism is important, it is because many outcomes are determined by how much of it we bring to the task. It is an important ingredient of success. This flies in the face of an elite view that skill is the primary requirement of a good life. Yet in many cases, the difference between success and failure can be determined by nothing more than one’s sense of what is possible and the energy one can muster to convince others of one’s due. One can be doomed not by a lack of talent, but by an absence of hope.

Rarely are today’s problems created by people taking too sunny a view of things; it is because the troubles of the world are so continually brought to our attention that we stand in need of tools which can preserve our more hopeful dispositions. 

Matisse himself knew a huge amount about suffering (which builds our confidence in his pleasing, hopeful, charming work) – as a glance at one of his self-portraits shows. 


Matisse knew all about tragedy but his acquaintance with it made him all the more alive to its opposites. As he saw it, the real problem was that darkness and misery are so likely to overpower us that we actually need to make a deliberate effort to remind ourselves of cheerful and hopeful things.  

Matisse was born in 1869 into a relatively prosperous family. His father was a hardware and grain merchant. He wasn’t supposed to be an artist. His father was very keen that he should have a safe, respectable – and lucrative – career as a lawyer. In his twenties he became desperate to give up his day job in the law office but his father was strongly opposed. Eventually he relented and agreed that Matisse could study – but only so long as he kept to the most traditional and conservative style. 

In order to develop as a painter of joyful, bright and sensuous pictures, Matisse had to face down his father, embrace poverty (when all family support was cut off) and be reviled by his teachers and mentors. 

In the years before the outbreak of the First World War Matisse started to build up a successful career. He was selling a few pictures. He was getting well known in adventurous artistic circles. Just as he seemed to be making it, the whole world started to fall apart. 

In the year of the Battle of the Somme, he painted The Window.



It’s not that Matisse didn’t care about the trenches, a day’s journey from Paris. It intensified his sense of the loveliness of the trunk of a tree just glimpsed through the gap in the curtains, or his delight in the pattern of the floorboards – and the overall freshness and charm of a bowl of flowers in an elegant, but unpretentious room in the city. It’s as if he is reminding himself (and us) that these things are still here. They haven’t been destroyed. It’s not the work of someone who is indifferent. It is created in recognition of how easily one could be paralysed with despair. And the hint of light green leaves through the window might speak kindly to us, even today, when we’re overburdened with our own sense of the weight of life.

Later, there were more private traumas. Matisse was diagnosed with duodenal cancer. He was involved in a protracted and very painful legal dispute with his estranged wif


In 1942 when Paris had fallen, and the German 6th Army was pushing through Russia towards the southern oilfields, Matisse painted a number of pictures of dancers, with fabulous legs, reclining in big, soft armchairs. 

The most poignant of his cheerful, hopeful works were produced at the very end of his life, around about 1950 when he was in his eighties. He had been an invalid for years; mostly bedridden, occasionally able to get around in a wheelchair. He knew he was facing death.


The deep blue and yellow – and the simple pattern – of the stained glass seems to glow with delight in existence. But Matisse wasn’t expressing a cheerfulness he had recently experienced. The vulnerable, suffering great painter was attempting to ward off his own fears of gloom and despondency; he was reminding us through his genius that there is nothing quite as serious as knowing how to hope.

https://www.henrimatisse.org/

Monday, January 30, 2023

Surviving February , medieval style

 


In February take care that you don't burn your fingers & toes. 🔥

#MedievalCalendar BL Add 62925; the 'Rutland Psalter'; c.1260 CE; England, S. E.; f.1 @BLMedieval


 



February is the time for burning and gathering wood.  #MedievalCalendar BL Yates Thompson MS 3; 'The Dunois Hours'; c 1439 CE-c 1450 CE; France (Paris); f.2r



The feast days of February #MedievalCalendar BL Harley MS 2332; Illustrated Almanac; 1411 CE-1412 CE; England; ff.2v-3r



Saturday, January 28, 2023

Alice Neel, an American Original

 









Alice Neel, an unshakable original, witnessed a parade of avant-garde movements from Abstract Expressionism to Conceptual Art, and refused to follow any of them. Instead, she developed a unique, expressive style of portrait painting that captured the psychology of individuals living in New York, from friends and neighbors in Spanish Harlem to celebrities. Part of what makes Neel one of the greatest American portraitists of the 20th century is her refusal of traditional categories (gender, age race, social status, etc.). She does not presume what she does not know. She observes each subject with a fresh eye. Neel's insights into the human condition never wavered, remaining direct, unflinching, and always empathetic but not necessarily sympathetic.

During the 1940s and ’50s, from her modest studio in New York, Alice Neel saw the heyday of Abstract Expressionism come and go. Then, during the ’60s, Pop art passed by, and soon, Minimalism did, too. All the while, Neel continued working, producing figurative paintings decidedly out of step with what was popular at the time in the art world.

The artists associated with Abstract Expressionism, Pop, and Minimalism were interested in defamiliarizing the human form, reducing and reconstructing individuals to color and line. Neel, a painter apart from her time, was curious about people just as they were. She worked in a mode known as social realism, confronting humanity forthright with no irony to spare the viewer. It’s a style best glimpsed in a self-portrait made in 1980, four years before her death. Neel painted herself seated in an armchair and wearing only her glasses. One of her hands holds a paintbrush, and in the other, she clutches a rag. She peers out unassumingly at the viewer with a gaze that almost suggests a hint of judgement, as if she’s trying to say: “Yes, and?”





https://www.theartstory.org/artist/neel-alice/

https://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/listings/2021/alice-neel

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_Neel


 


Monday, January 23, 2023

Manet.

 









Édouard Manet, (born January 23, 1832, Paris, France—died April 30, 1883, Paris), French painter who broke new ground by defying traditional techniques of representation and by choosing subjects from the events and circumstances of his own time. His Le Déjeuner sur l’herbe (Luncheon on the Grass), exhibited in 1863 at the Salon des Refusés, aroused the hostility of critics and the enthusiasm of the young painters who later formed the nucleus of the Impressionist group. His other notable works include Olympia (1863) and A Bar at the Folies-Bergère (1882).


Edouard Manet (1832-1883), dubbed in his day the Father of Impressionism, was nothing of the kind. Indulgent and supportive, he bought paintings by Impressionists but he exhibited in none of their exhibitions (1874-1886) and, indeed, at 51, died well before their sequence ended. He preferred the path of long academic training, his ambition to exhibit at the Salon, the Parisian equivalent of the Royal Academy; this he achieved but not without the sour adversity of powerful Salonards and the mocking hostility of influential critics, the insiders objecting to his alla prima technique (that is painting directly on the canvas without preliminary studies, the composition adjusted and edited in progress, the brushwork free and fluent and perspective left to chance), the outsiders bemused and angrily disturbed by subjects in which Manet broke all the technical rules and ignored the traditional hierarchies that made, for example, a history painting mightily superior to a still life.

Manet knew these rules, and others too, for he came from a social background of civil service, diplomacy and the aristocratic reserve of the high bourgeoisie. Intended for the Navy, he failed, and at 18 in 1850 enrolled for six years as a student of Thomas Couture who, at the Salon three years earlier, had sprung to fame (and notoriety) with his enormous and much debated history painting, The Romans of the Decadence. Under Couture he learned the ancestral techniques of his trade (though he was swiftly to abandon them) and copied the painters of Renaissance Venice and 17th-century Spain and Holland who were to be both profound influences and the subjects of respectful subversion in his work. He wanted Couture’s popular success, critical acclaim and commissions but when, in 1859, he made his first submission to the Salon, he was rejected. In 1861 (the Salon was biennial) he tried again and two paintings were accepted, but in 1863 he was again rejected — indeed, so many other painters were rejected that Napoleon III commanded the immediate institution of the Salon des Refusés (the first hint that a Salon jury might be fallible), at which Manet’s now celebrated Déjeuner sur l’Herbe caused one of the great brouhahas in the history of art criticism. The absolute power of a Salon jury in Manet’s day may seem extraordinary and outrageous but it is matched today by the similarly arbitrary power of the Arts Council and of Serota and his Tates. Until his death 20 years on, the Salon maintained its ambivalence towards his work, but Manet remained convinced that it was the proper place for him to exhibit and be judged, though he was contemptuous of jurors whom he damned as “an ill-mannered lot” for whom he “wouldn’t give a f-”. Conservative in temperament and wealthy enough to go his own way, he could afford to offend the Salonards while wishing to be one of them.

Though many letters and reports of conversations survive (no book gives us more insight than Juliet Wilson-Bareau’s Manet by Himself, 1991), Manet issued no manifesto, no statement of intent; instead, his paintings were the preachers of a gospel of which he was, perhaps, almost unconscious — that just as past painters had treated subjects biblical, historical and genre as though they were contemporary events (certainly so in costume and ancillary motif), so too could he, at the same time abandoning these ancestral sources for subjects offered by everyday life in the Paris of his time. He was in essence a studio painter, rarely a man for working in the open air; he preferred a posed model, not the casual incident, and the stillness of the studio confines many of his subjects; he rejected the broken brushwork touch of the Impressionists and the cod-science of their colour, and instead rejoiced in the fluent stroke of the loaded brush — sometimes long, sometimes flickering — and in the rich black paint that in its contrast heightened his colour and was his drawing implement.

In this he established a new technique — an incisive bravura that anticipated Sargent — and a new aesthetic, but, as with Impressionism, Cubism and other -isms, it was left to later men to analyse and formulate his intentions, and 130 years on the debate is still not settled. After a working life of only a quarter of a century, Manet could argue in the year before his death that “Concision in art is a necessity and a matter of elegance ... Look for the essential areas of light and shade in a figure and the rest will fall into place ... Don’t make it a chore, no, never a chore!” Yet a chore it often was, and paintings that were not immediately what he wished were often scraped down, a whole day’s work rejected and revised so often and so much that the survivors became records of long conversations between the painter and his canvases, for only they could show him that he was in error. Often he proved to be not quite the best judge of his own work and allowed too many trifles to survive.

For the last five years of his life Manet found it increasingly difficult to stand at his easel, the reason syphilis, either contracted in 1848-49 when on a preparatory training voyage to Brazil for the Naval College, a boy of 16 or 17 being made a man by his mates in one of Rio de Janeiro’s brothels, or inherited from his father, for his later life was one of uxorious devotion and discretion. After many attempted cures gangrene set in and in April 1883 his left leg was amputated. He did not recover.

Sunday, January 22, 2023

Year of the Rabbit, Medieval Style

 


Trinity College, Cambridge B.11.22, f.28r





The year of the Rabbit comes riding in BL Add MS 89379, 92r



The rabbit is baking something special for the #YearOfTheRabbit 🐇 BL Lansdowne 451, f.6r


Leap for joy as it will be #TheYearOfTheRabbit ! @BLMedieval

BL Stowe 17, f.225v 


Ring them bells. It's the Year of the Rabbit.  B.11.22; Book of Hours (Use of Rome); 13th century; 14th century; f.6r 

Friday, January 20, 2023

Julia Morgan. Great American Woman Architect.

 















Architect Julia Morgan, who was born on this day in 1872, is often remembered as one of the first great American female architects. She was the first woman to be licensed as an architect in California and designed over 700 buildings in 50 years. She was also one of the first women to study civil engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. In 1897, Morgan became the first woman admitted to Ecole des Beaux-Arts in Paris, a prestigious architecture school. Some of her most notable works are the Hearst Castle, Asilomar YWCA, and the St. John's Presbyterian Church in Berkeley. In 2014, Morgan became the first woman to receive The American Institute of Architects' Gold Medal." -- via the National Women's History Museum
Julia Morgan: Architect of Beauty" (https://amzn.to/3KuzBGb) and Julia Morgan: An Intimate Biography of the Trailblazing Architect" (https://amzn.to/3KsgD2F)

Thursday, January 19, 2023

Cezanne. The man who created modern art


 


IN THE FALL OF 1894, the American painter Mary Cassatt attended a dinner in the countryside outside Paris with a group of artists, among them the notoriously bohemian Paul Cezanne. "His manners at first startled me," she wrote to a friend. "He scrapes his soup plate, then lifts it and pours the remaining drops in the spoon; he even takes his chop in his fingers and pulls the meat from the bone.... Yet in spite of the total disregard of the dictionary of manners, he shows a politeness towards us which no other man here would have shown."

As Cassatt observed, there was something surprising, even contradictory, about Cezanne. He spouted profanities yet could recite long passages of Virgil and Ovid in Latin. He scorned priests but went faithfully to Mass. He hated the official Paris Salon but kept submitting his work to its judges. He haunted the Louvre, copying sculptures and paintings into his sketchbooks, yet critics said he couldn't draw. He was obsessed with tradition and obsessed with overturning it. He felt himself a failure ... and the best painter of his time.

PAUL CEZANNE wanted to make paint bleed. The old masters, he told the poet Joachim Gasquet, painted warmblooded flesh and made sap run in their trees, and he would too. He wanted to capture "the green odor" of his Provence fields and "the perfume of marble from Saint-Victoire," the mountain that was the subject of so many of his paintings. He was bold, scraping and slapping paint onto his still lifes with a palette knife. "I will astonish Paris with an apple," he boasted.

In the years when his friends Manet, Monet, Pissarro and Renoir were finally gaining acceptance, Cezanne worked furiously and mostly in isolation, ridiculed by critics and mocked by the public, sometimes ripping up his own canvases. He wanted more than the quick impressions of the Impressionists (nature, he wrote to a fellow artist, "is more depth than surface") and devoted himself to studying the natural world. "It's awful for me;" he told a young friend, "my eyes stay riveted to the tree trunk, to the clod of earth. It's painful for me to tear them away.... And my eyes, you know, my wife tells me that they jump out of my head." He could often be found, said one contemporary, "on the outskirts of Paris wandering about the hillsides in jackboots. As no one took the least interest in his pictures, he left them in the fields."

Yet by the end of his life, Cezanne had been recognized, at least by some critics, as a true revolutionary who overturned the rules of painting and upended conventional theories of color. And his paintings were clearly an inspiration to artists who followed, including Matisse, Picasso and Alberto Giacometti.

He was a rebel from the start. Among his earliest paintings--finished when he was 23--are four huge wall panels of young women representing the four seasons. He painted them in the elegant, academic style of Ingres, so pleasing to bourgeoisie taste. They decorated the salon of the family estate in Aix. The panels were parodies--he even signed one "Ingres"--showing off his skill while disguising his mockery. In the center of the same wall, Cezanne hung a portrait he painted of his father, a hatmaker turned banker. The painting was done with a palette knife--its thick, crude slabs of paint suggesting the handiwork of a mason or plasterer. The technique had been used by Cezanne's hero Gustave Courbet, a radical painter of the previous generation, but Cezanne wielded the knife more aggressively, with quick, almost violent strokes. Referring to a portrait that Cezanne made of his sister Marie (modeled on portraits by the Spanish artist EI Greco that Cezanne was copying at the time), the American artist James McNeill Whistler would later say, "If a 10 year old child had drawn that on his slate, his mother, if she was a good mother, would have whipped him."

Cezanne's technique, a style he called couillarde, or ballsy, suited his early subjects--murders, rapes and orgies among them. "The young Cezanne wanted to make people scream," says French art historian Jean-Claude Lebensztejn. "He attacked on all fronts, drawing, color, technique, proportion, subjects ... he savagely demolished everything one loves." To accomplish this, says Lebensztejn, Cezanne drew on tradition, adapting themes from the erotic art of Titian and the disasters of Goya.

Cezanne's father, Louis-Auguste, tried to set the young man straight. Remember, he said, we die with genius, but we eat with money. The two were frequently at odds. Cezanne briefly studied law, as a step to joining his father's bank, but it didn't take. His boyhood friend and Aix schoolmate Emile Zola--Cezanne was once beaten up by school bullies for befriending him--was living in Paris and urged Cezanne to join him there. Cezanne's father finally agreed, and sent him off with an allowance to study art. The artist would resent this patronage all his life, even though he depended on it. His mother, Elizabeth, supported his desire to be an artist and tried to keep peace in the family by mediating between father and son.

In Paris, Cezanne, then in his early 20s, applied to the Ecole des Beaux Arts, training ground of Salon painters, but he was rejected. "Unfortunately, he paints with excess," noted a former student of Ingres. Cezanne was soon installed in the Atelier Suisse, a studio long favored by upstarts, including Courbet. Even here, Cezanne stood out. Pissarro, who was intrigued by this "peculiar Provencal" and went to see him at the Atelier Suisse in 1861, recalled later that Cezanne's life studies "provoked roars of laughter from all the impotents of the school."

His friend Zola was one of the few to champion him. Zola had not forgotten the incident that had sealed their friendship; the day after Cezanne had been attacked for defending him, Zola had brought Cezanne a basket of apples. Late in life, Cezanne tied this incident to his still lifes, telling his friend Gasquet, "Ah, Cezanne's apples, they go far back." Now Zola, who moonlighted as an art critic, defended Cezanne's paintings--even if he didn't always understand them. (Zola and Cezanne would, in fact, become estranged in their later years after Zola published a novel that many felt portrayed Cezanne as a failed genius.)

Year after year Cezanne presented his work to the official Salon, "carrying his canvases," one critic noted, "on his back like Jesus his cross." And year after year he was rejected. In 1865 he and Pissarro, nine years his elder, began to paint together out-of-doors in villages outside Paris. The collaboration made both men more daring. From Pissarro, Cezanne picked up a sense of discipline and a habit of unremitting daily practice that would mark the rest of his life. He also began incorporating brighter colors and explored new ways of applying paint, using both brushes and palette knives. One day, a villager who watched the two artists reported: "Monsieur Pissarro, when he painted, dabbed, and Monsieur Cezanne smeared."

But in other ways the two men were similar. "They both shared in common their humongous needs, their egos," says the Museum of Modern Art's Joachim Pissarro, the painter's great-grandson and curator of the "Cezanne & Pissarro" exhibition. "They needed to be fed, like monsters, these bulks of tradition that they gulped down and re-digested in their own ways."

In March 1865, Cezanne wrote a note to Pissarro about the work he and another young painter were submitting to the Salon: "On Saturday we are going to the barrack of the Champs-Elysees to bring our canvases, which will make the Institute blush with rage and despair." But it was Edouard Manet who made the crowds blush that year. Salon officials accepted his painting of a naked courtesan, Olympia, an adaptation of a Titian Venus but painted without the conventional refinement. (Nearly a decade later, in 1874, Cezanne, who was tired of hearing Manet's canvas praised, would paint a retort to Manet he titled A Modern Olympia. He wanted, wrote Cezanne biographer John Rewald, "to create an Olympia more female, more attractive and more desirable than the proud courtesan of Manet." But when Cezanne's version was displayed in Paris, critics had a field day. Cezanne, wrote one, "can only be a bit of a madman, afflicted while painting with delirium tremens." Even Pissarro referred to it as "a five-footed sheep.")

Though Cezanne continued to paint with Pissarro, it was Manet he considered the leading modern painter--and the man to beat. One evening in the early 1870s, according to Claude Monet, Cezanne made the rounds at the Cafe Goerbois in Paris shaking everyone's hand. But when he came to Manet he tipped his hat and said, "I won't offer you my hand, Monsieur Manet. I haven't washed in eight days." It was a gesture both of respect and insolence, says Jean-Claude Lebensztejn: "Manet haunted Cezanne."

Cezanne was nothing if not a loner. Friends, admirers, other artists were suspect: "They want to get their hooks into me," he complained. "The meanness of people is such," he wrote in one of his last letters to his son, "that I should never be able to get away from it--it is theft, complacency, infatuation, violation, the seizing of your work." He worried that other artists would steal his secrets--especially his ideas about color--and was convinced that Paul Gauguin had done just that. He disliked being touched (even his son would ask permission before taking his arm), and he was fearful of women. "Women models frighten me," he once said, "you've got to be on the defensive all the time." On a rare occasion when he hired one, he panicked when she began to undress and pushed her, half naked, out the door of his Paris studio. When, around 1869, he met and fell in love with Hortense Fiquet, a 19-year-old model 11 years his junior, he took great pains to hide her from his father (who still held the purse strings). They lived apart as much as together during their 37-year relationship, even after their son, Paul Jr., was born in 1872. And though Fiquet, a tall and handsome brunette whom he finally married in 1886 (a few months before his father died), apparently had no interest in his paintings, she put up with his quirks, didn't interfere with his work and posed for him for hours on end. She stares out from the many portraits he made of her looking bored or pained. "Be an apple!" Cezanne would tell his sitters. Her patience helped make him a master of the modern portrait.

When the German poet Rainer Maria Rilke, who said that Cezanne's paintings were one of the principal influences on his poetry, saw the portrait of Fiquet known as Madame Cezanne in a Red Armchair (left), painted circa 1877, when Cezanne was about 38, he wrote: "It is the first and ultimate red armchair ever painted.... The interior of the picture vibrates, rises, falls back into itself, and does not have a single unmoving part."

Cezanne was constantly seeking new ways of handling form and perspective. And in many of his canvases he succeeded in creating a new sense of space. Standing in front of Landscape, Auvers-sur-Oise (1874) at the Museum of Modern Art show, Joachim Pissarro said: "In this landscape, try to figure out where you are sitting. Are you sitting on the edge of the wall? Are you falling off the side of the path? It's not so dramatic that it gives you a sense of vertigo, but still, it's completely incomprehensible, it's a sense of being above the void! This is where Cezanne is totally a key to Modernism."

Cezanne's growing mastery did not ease his brooding sense of failure. On his first trip to Paris, in 1861, he had ripped up an unfinished portrait of Emile Zola. Two decades later, it was Madame Zola's turn. As she posed for him in her garden, Cezanne suddenly poked holes in the canvas, broke his brushes and stalked off. Renoir recalled once retrieving a scrap of paper outside Cezanne's studio in Aix--"a most exquisite watercolor [he] had discarded after spending twenty sessions on it."

"My hair is longer than my talent," Cezanne complained in his 20s. At 50, he wrote that "the many studies to which I have dedicated myself have given me only negative results." And in 1905, a year before he died, he lamented, "My age and my health will never allow me to realize the artistic dream I have pursued throughout my entire life."

Cezanne's Impressionist friends took a different view. "How does he do it?" Renoir marveled. "He can't put two touches of paint on a canvas without success." On another occasion Renoir declared, "I don't think you can find any artist who compares with Cezanne in the whole history of painting." Pissarro said, "If you want to learn to paint, look at Cezanne." But Cezanne, it seems, couldn't take a compliment. Monet wrote about an incident at a dinner with a group of artists at his home in Giverny. When Monet started to tell Cezanne of his friends' love and admiration, Cezanne interrupted. "You, too, are making fun of me!" he protested, grabbing his coat and rushing out the door.

It was the impossibility of the task Cezanne had set for himself that accounted for his sense of failure. He called himself "a slave to nature," but he knew that he could never completely capture the natural landscape on canvas. "Art is harmony parallel to nature," he once said.

As he moved beyond Impressionism, Cezanne began investigating new ways to stimulate the eye, painting with touches and patches of color in carefully calculated juxtaposition to one another. He was looking for a new visual logic, as if to say that art lies, as he put it, "in what our eyes think." (Kathryn Tuma, assistant professor of modern art at Johns Hopkins University, says that looking at The Red Rock, a c. 1895 Cezanne landscape, in natural light at the Orangerie in Paris several years ago, she saw "dynamic, flickering vibrations of color appear as if floating in front of the surface of the work"--an effect she likens to Rilke's description of seeing vibrations in Madame Cezanne in a Red Armchair.)

Cezanne, according to one account, "would sit motionless in the landscape, like a lizard in the sun, patiently waiting and watching the shifting scene for the appearance of what he wanted to catch in paint." Indeed, he once told a friend: "I would rather smash my canvas than invent or imagine a detail. I want to know."

Painting as a search for knowledge is something that would engage many artists of the next generation--and Cezanne's art may be easier to grasp in retrospect, through their eyes. Mondrian, who couldn't stop reworking his later canvases, explained, "I don't want pictures. I just want to find things out." And Picasso remarked, "One doesn't make a painting, one makes studies, one never ends getting near." James Lord, the biographer of Alberto Giacometti, says the artist often called his sculptures failures. "But that was only because he wanted to do the impossible," Lord notes. "He wanted to make the impossible possible, and nobody can do that." The same was true of Cezanne.

DURING THE LAST DECADE or so of his life, Cezanne lived mainly in his hometown of Aix. There he painted his monumental bathers, his astonishing apples, his moving portraits, his Provencal scenes and, above all, his beloved mountain. "See this Sainte-Victoire," he told a friend, "what lift, what imperious thirst for the sun, and what melancholy in the evening when all her weight falls back.... Her bluish shadows are part of the air's ambient breathing."

In his black frock coat, he looked like a banker as he painted. He was so reclusive that some in the art world thought he had died. For a time, his work could be found only in the shop of an eccentric Paris art dealer, Pere Tanguy, who had traded Cezanne art supplies for paintings. When Tanguy died, however, a more ambitious dealer, Ambroise Vollard, took possession of the paintings and tracked down the artist in Aix. He proposed a show, and in 1895 Cezanne, then 56, at last astonished Paris with his first one-man show, an exhibition of some 150 paintings, including a number of his still lifes of apples. The artist, wrote one critic, is "destined for the Louvre." But Cezanne stayed away, leaving the business end of dealing with Vollard to his 23-year-old son, who had remained in Paris.

After Cezanne's mother died, in 1897, the artist and his two sisters sold the family estate, and he moved to an apartment on the street where his father's bank had been. Vollard was selling his work, even raising the prices, and in 1899 he came to Aix and bought everything in the artist's studio.

In 1901, Cezanne oversaw the construction of Les Lauves, a studio on a hill overlooking the town, close to his favorite view of Sainte-Victoire. By then, his fame had spread and young artists, including Emile Bernard, came to learn from him. But his time was running out. "Someone else will accomplish what I have not been able to do," he said. "I am probably only the primitive of a new art."

Cezanne once spoke of what he called Titian, Rubens and Rembrandt's "sublime compromise"--the painters' ability to express profound emotion in a very personal way yet with a realism faithful to nature. In the end, Cezanne too achieved this compromise, but in a radically new fashion. "In the late portraits of Cezanne's gardener Vallier," says Philip Conisbee, "the encrusted surface of the old man, his gnarled hands, the ravaged face with its shadowed eyes, recall the late portraits of Rembrandt. A comparable feeling of tragedy, of impending death, is powerfully present. At the same time, the views he painted from the terrace of Les Lauves are radiant. In The Garden of Les Lauves, Cezanne's deep feeling for nature is translated into a series of color patches so abstract that, in hindsight, they seem to anticipate the abstract art of a far later era."

On October 15, 1906, Cezanne climbed the winding road that led from his studio to his favorite lookout to paint his mountain, as he'd done a hundred times before. But while he worked, he was caught in a sudden thunderstorm and collapsed. A passerby found him and carried him, half conscious, back into town on a laundry cart. "I want to die painting," he had told a friend. His last letter was to a dealer who supplied his paints. "It is now eight days since I asked you to send me ten burnt lakes no. 7 and I have had no reply," he wrote. "Whatever is the matter? An answer and quick, please." He died of pneumonia six days after writing the letter.

A year later, a major exhibition of Cezanne's works opened at the Salon d'Autumne in Paris. Picasso, Braque and Matisse were among those crowding into the show--and stealing his secrets. But they would never steal his grandeur. Rilke, too, was there. "Not since Moses," he wrote to his wife, "has anyone seen a mountain so greatly."

New Mexico-based author and artist PAUL TRACHTMAN wrote about Toulouse-Lautrec in the May 2005 issue.

Thomson Gale Document Number:A141100126